Model Releases
We've massively improved our document parsing capabilities across the board in the past ~3 months. Our LlamaParse cost-effective mode is one…
We've massively improved our document parsing capabilities across the board in the past ~3 months. Our LlamaParse cost-effective mode is one of the cheapest OCR solutions out there at <0.4c per page,
We've massively improved our document parsing capabilities across the board in the past ~3 months. Our LlamaParse cost-effective mode is one of the cheapest OCR solutions out there at <0.4c per page, and it has improved a lot on parsing since when we first put out the ParseBench paper a few months ago. 📈 10%+ improvement on complex tables 📈 10%+ improvement on charts 📈 20%+ improvement on grounding We plot this along with other modes against a comprehensive set of models on ParseBench, our comprehensive benchmark for real-world docs. This includes the latest VLMs like Gemini 3.8 Flash / Fable 5.1, along with new modes from specialized OCR providers. Some providers don't have native chart parsing (or are relegated to other modes), so for the sake of completeness we also include the benchmark that excludes the chart dimension entirely. Our team is shipping like crazy and only accelerating 🚀 ParseBench: https://www.parsebench.ai/ LlamaParse: https://cloud.llamaindex.ai/
Related
- There’s generally a massive difference in quality between specialized OCR providers, “simple” open-weight OCR models, and free/OSS solutions…
- 🦙☀️ It’s a hot Llama summer, and it pays to be a PRO at document parsing. For a limited time, upgrade to the LlamaParse Pro plan and we'll …
- As a point of comparison, our commercial document OCR solution LlamaParse wins on all relevant dimensions (except content faithfulness again…
Source: Jerry Liu (X) | 2026-09-04