Tutorials
Why Do Conventional World Models Fail to Learn Cellular Automata?
arXiv:2609.39604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although conventional world models - auto-regressive or diffusion models based on transformers or convolutional networks - may learn surface statistics
arXiv:2609.39604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although conventional world models - auto-regressive or diffusion models based on transformers or convolutional networks - may learn surface statistics of world dynamics, can they learn the exact world dynamics from its observed history? Leveraging cellular automata as a simple testbed, we find the answer to be no in many cases. Conventional architectures predict most pixels correctly yet rarely complete a rollout: a CNN predicts 96.3% of cells but completes 18.9% of rollouts; a joint diffusion model completes none. We trace the gap to three failure modes of these world models - namely, they fail to exactly capture spatial locality, temporal locality or temporal stability. Simple changes repair each: (1) for spatial locality, two-dimensional rotary positions lift a transformer from 39.1% to 100% on the Game of Life; (2) for temporal locality, handing each token its cell's previous-frame neighbourhood lifts the same transformer from 25.8% to 99.9% on unseen rules; (3) for temporal stability, causal freezing lifts the same diffusion weights from 42.2% to 99.9%. None of the three changes touches the architectural backbone; each only modifies the information flow within it. We also compare joint and ordered sampling on billiards and, in an exploratory study, on a simulated Burgers equation.
Related
- Transformers Can Learn Connectivity in Some Graphs but Not Others
- Abductive World Modeling via Causal Representation Learning
- TaskSense: Focusing on What Matters in World Models
- A Close Look At World Model Recovery In Supervised Fine-Tuned LLM Planners
- A Definition and Roadmap for World Models
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-01