Search: “gary-marcus--x”

This post by AI researcher Gary Marcus likely compares a prediction or timeline claim about robotaxi deployment to Elon Musk's previous statements about achieving ubiquitous robotaxis within a year, q

Maybe Section 230 doesn’t shield AI companies after all. That would be huge. https://open.substack.com/pub/garymarcus/p/maybe-section-230-doesnt-shield-ai?r=8tdk6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&show

OpenAI is reportedly considering significant price reductions for its AI services, according to a Wall Street Journal report shared by AI researcher Gary Marcus. The move would likely reflect competit

Pop quiz, which of these is no longer true (or at least directionally true), two years later? 9 reasons that OpenAI could someday be seen as the WeWork of AI: 👉 Lots of competitors are catching up. 👉

This tweet from 14 hours ago is on track to get about a million views. But here’s the thing: the conclusion is true, but the tweet itself is already outdated. WSJ’s scoop that OpenAI is considering dr

Gary Marcus discusses expert commentary and analysis regarding OpenAI's initial public offering filing, likely examining implications for the AI industry, company valuation, and competitive landscape.

Wrong horse and too early. Gary nailed it. Time will show this. Masa can hype AI all he likes, but apparently he can’t even get a loan on his OpenAI shares. 🤔 But I actually half agree—and it might su

100%, hallucinations are baked in (as I have been saying since 2001) and that is why basically no LLM company afford to operate in Germany now. We need a better technology. @GaryMarcus Lol, and Google

AI oligarchs are trying to buy elections (again) AI titans are spending 1.3M to shape Utah primaries. Defending Our Values, run by Chris Stewart, spent 880K to support Rep. Celeste Maloy. DOV operates

Gary Marcus discusses breaking news and potential existential risks or significant developments related to AI systems, likely examining how current AI capabilities and limitations might lead to critic

Gary Marcus acknowledges in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that his commentary or analysis on a particular topic does not constitute a formal scientific survey or rigorous study. The statement suggest

Anthropic, if they really believe what they say, should show some leadership: 🔔 IF Anthropic is for real about safety, the should pause, for one month, and show leadership. If they won’t pause, even b

🚨Breaking news that could be huge, and enormously bad for GenAI, if other countries make similar decisions. https://the-decoder.com/landmark-german-ruling-declares-googles-ai-overviews-are-googles-own

BREAKING! This may well be the beginning of the end. 🚨BREAKING: SoftBank tried to borrow 6 billion against its 13% OpenAI stock… to keep funding OpenAI Banks said NO They don’t believe OpenAI is worth

discussed more here: I was first to call the death of tokenmaxxing (ahead of @zerohedge), among the first (in 2023) to warn that the economics of Generative AI was problematic, and first (also 2023) t

Gary Marcus expresses frustration about the rapid pace of AI developments, noting that he hopes for a day without significant breakthroughs requiring commentary, but finds himself continually disappoi

This post likely discusses expert analysis on German legal proceedings involving Google, covering questions about appeal options available to the company, the timeline for implementing a court ruling,

I argued, publicly, AGAINST each of these foolish predictions– and got endless shit for it. Moral: on X, you probably shouldn’t trust the “wisdom” of the crowds. Remember all the AI predictions people

I was first to call the death of tokenmaxxing (ahead of @zerohedge), among the first (in 2023) to warn that the economics of Generative AI was problematic, and first (also 2023) to warn that OpenAI co

🔔 IF Anthropic is for real about safety, the should pause, for one month, and show leadership. If they won’t pause, even briefly, we have a different kind of answer about what is real and what is mark

If the new German court decision — to hold LLM companies liable for the false claims their LLMs made — become universal, effectively sidelining generative AI until better techniques came along, would

It is not literally impossible to pause or slow down. It is a choice. But if the “frontier labs” continue to refuse to do, I strongly believe it will eventually lead to tremendous harm. (Essentially e

Masa can hype AI all he likes, but apparently he can’t even get a loan on his OpenAI shares. 🤔 But I actually half agree—and it might surprise some of my critics to hear this, especially those who hav

Me, 2024. LLMs will be commodity; (except for Nvdia) profits will be hard to squeeze out. Techbros: Shut up, Gary. GPT-5 is gonna be AGI. Today: LLMs are commodity; (except for Nvidia) profits have be

New series from The Observer with @Yoshua_Bengio, me, and others on potential catastrophic risks in AI. (link at bottom of thread) For the last few months I’ve been investigating how concerned we shou

Gary Marcus critiques Oracle's after-hours stock decline following announcements of increased capital allocation toward AI initiatives, suggesting skepticism about the company's AI strategy and spendi

Prediction (which I have made before and which increasingly seems likely) OpenAI is gonna fall, and take a lot down with it. BREAKING: SoftBank shares fall 9% after its attempt secure a $6 billion mar

A question posed on X regarding whether a recent 10% decline in the tech market will impact SpaceX's planned IPO timing and execution. The post, from AI researcher and entrepreneur Gary Marcus, raises

really good point. who else? BREAKING; Bill Gates just told Congress that Jeffrey Epstein had sought to use Gates’ affairs in an effort to blackmail him. So the question now is, if he did this to Bill

So far today • Banks to SoftBank: No thanks; OpenAI stock ain’t worth what you say. • Germany to Google: LLMs can be held liable • Senator Warren to SEC and SpaceX: Fix this mess; it’’s foul play to s

subtle shift: some folks seemed to have shifted from expecting truly exponential progress to being happy they can find measurable progress at all. and another, even larger group has grown concerned ab

Gary Marcus warns about a widespread scam epidemic involving fake profiles that use stolen pictures and randomly generated usernames/handles to deceive people. He shares an example of his response to

“They have been running literally the same play for seven years: scare, hype (evoking media interest), and (eventually) release. Scare, hype, release. And repeat. Is it that hard to see?” 👇🏼 - @GaryMa

This is genuinely big news, major unintended consequences. 🚨Breaking news that could be huge, and enormously bad for GenAI, if other countries make similar decisions. https://the-decoder.com/landmark-

this is important. and scary. CAISI has reportedly been directed to stop publishing public model assessments as the new AI EO gets implemented. Natsec engagement on AI is essential. But pulling CAISI'

Senator Elizabeth Warren criticized the SEC for insufficient enforcement and investor protection, urging the agency to strengthen oversight and prevent harm to retail investors. The post, shared by AI

What if, Germany locked itself out of the LLM race and • Had students who actually learned things in high school, instead of turning in prompt outputs they barely read • Emerged from the sea of slop •

With SoftBank apparently struggling to get a margin loan against it’s OpenAI shares, it’s maybe time to repost this, from two years ago. The vast majority of my earlier worries remain: 9 reasons that

Wow. This is worth watching, might have huge impact. @SenWarren makes some valid points, and the SEC owes her public answers Sen. Warren calls on SEC to delay SpaceX IPO @CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/202

👇@zerohedge confirms what I said here and in my May 29 Marcus on AI newsletter. Tokenmaxxing RIP. This morning @zerohedge out with a report on the death of Tokenmaxxing 'Microsoft’s AI Chief added to

1. Pausing until we had a much firmer idea of how to make AI safe—and well-aligned with human values—might well be a good idea. but 2. I trust neither of these companies, but fear that both will say “

absolutely correct @GaryMarcus I've recently learned not to believe anything that anyone says anymore when it comes to AI companies. They're all competing to win against each other while exploiting, s

alienating your customers before you IPO is maybe not the best idea, @AnthropicAI Brilliant idea! Next up: Apple randomly reboots your Mac if you're building competing tech, Gmail silently edits your

Anthropic didn’t just add guardrails to make Mythos safer; they added guardrails to protect their own IP. *Their own IP*. They are still as happy as fuck to build their AI on other people’s IP. Intere

Anthropic played the media like a fiddle. From “untold catastrophe” to “check our latest model”, in two months and a day 🙄 (cc @tomfriedman) This is the scary phase of AI — a model deemed so powerful

but but i thought it was magic? What we learned testing Claude Fable/Mythos 5 on Vending-Bench: > Performance: Makes less money than Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 > Alignment: A step back. (Opus 4.8 was better