Search: “gary-marcus--x”

This appears to be a social media comment acknowledging Gary Marcus's previous critical positions on AI, with the commenter suggesting that negative reactions directed at Marcus validate the accuracy

This post from Gary Marcus appears to reference a humorous or notable moment related to his work, with image attachments in Traditional Chinese that provide context to the claim that he 'has won again

@GaryMarcus @hendrycks @Yoshua_Bengio We recently tested all of the major LLMs with tic-tac-toe, modified chess, and a novel game -- even the top models all failed: illegal moves, claiming a win when

GOOGLE CEO: “THERE IS SOME IRRATIONALITY IN THE CURRENT AI BOOM. THE GROWTH OF AI INVESTMENT HAS BEEN AN EXTRAORDINARY MOMENT.” ASKED WHAT HAPPENS IF THE AI BUBBLE POPS, HE SAID: “I THINK NO COMPANY I

have always wondered about this: is it that the true believers willfully simply don’t want to understand my actual positions or do they lack the cognitive chops to follow them? @GaryMarcus This, sadly

here’s one sample, below, not even the only one I saw today; another claimed I don’t do research anymore when I had published articles in two top journals (Science and the Proceedings of The Royal Soc

he’s not dumb and certainly his IQ is above average but as I wrote somewhere before “I think that Musk has consistently made a dumb set of choices - largely stemming from a mix of four cognitive error

hilarious how all the objections to this post about how elon understands engineering better than science point to elon’s engineering accomplishments, rather than his (meager) record of scientific inno

⚠️⚠️⚠️i don’t think most people understand the implications of the mood shift below, so I will spell them out. they are serious, and eventually will affect the global economy. when a serious coder as

> I’m now in the LeCun/Marcus camp on LLMs > real programming agents will need world models > not some RLVR shit it’s over The Eternal Sloptember https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/2

Interesting point … but are there any critics of mine that are “authentic” who have laid out a systematic critique, without relying on strawmen? @GaryMarcus While addressing some critics can be helpfu

interestingly (although it is bit apples and oranges) the number below is a similar to the fraction of cars involved in car accidents (mostly nonfatal) in a week. but, crucially, we have tons of measu

It’s no longer just AI companies & their founders being sued over AI training - individual researchers are now being sued, too. In a new lawsuit, two authors allege that Guillaume Lample, while an AI

Let the record show: honest critique is not pessimism. Your points on scaling limits and neurosymbolic AI have been validated. Fair debate requires engaging with what was actually said. Retweeting thi

LLM companies are likely to be like airline companies: small margins, intense competition, high expenses. @GaryMarcus Airlines taught us something important: unlimited demand does not guarantee attrac

Gary Marcus discusses whether it is worthwhile to publicly document and explain the logical and conceptual errors made by his critics, framing it as a potential educational exercise. The post reflects

neurosymbolic by @swarat et al for the Erdos win, with much more careful, quantitative work than openai’s in hindsight i wonder whether OpenAI rushed theirs out, knowing this was coming? Another 9 ope

not using LLM’s works for me Prolonged AI use may make it harder to think critically and creatively, recent research suggests. But there are ways to keep the brain fit https://www.economist.com/scienc

Gary Marcus critiques Elon Musk's public perception, arguing that those lacking scientific expertise tend to overestimate Musk's genius while scientifically literate individuals recognize significant

sure, but could you look up at the sky with utter sincerity while you said it? @GaryMarcus 'Fastest growing business', 'loses $5B a year'. I could easily hemorrhage at least 3x that, if that's what 'b

The desperation of the tech bros is made vivid in all the lies they tell about me. Lies about my training. Lies about my experience. Lies about my publication record. Lies about the predictions I have

A Wall Street Journal report highlights the paradox that while the artificial intelligence industry experiences rapid growth, American public sentiment toward AI is increasingly negative. The article,

these kind of examples were cute three years ago now they are just sad 🦔Four viral examples of Google's AI Overview misfiring hit social media this week. One user searching for the definition of 'disr

this is bad SHOCKING: Two researchers at Northeastern sat down with six of the chatbots that hundreds of millions of people use every day. They typed a sentence anyone in distress might type at 3 in t

“We will have a crash, I just can't tell you when, and I can't tell you how deep. But I can assure you, unfortunately, I wish I wasn't saying this, we will have a crash,” says Andrew Ross Sorkin, fina

Well over 300,000 people seem to have felt the same way, roon’s attack, arrogant, misleading, and unprovoked, did OpenAI no favors. @GaryMarcus roon's attack on you is really making me think less of h

1. Agreed w @scaling01 that Mythos appears to be better GPT 5.5 on many metrics. 2. Mythos is definitely a major wakeup call wrt security, and will pose problems for real-world systems that aren’t wel

100%: if OpenAI flops, the gravy train stops. @GaryMarcus if OpenAI's IPO flops, gravy train is OVER! whole industry knows it, they're terrified of it, particularly as they're starting to get just how

Gary Marcus expressed concern about what he perceived as extreme desperation among those involved in IPO (Initial Public Offering) markets, characterizing their behavior as the most desperate he had w

Gary Marcus humorously describes riding an airport monorail as an example of a geofenced autonomous vehicle, highlighting how existing transportation systems already operate with limited autonomy with

an elaboration of the Paul Graham reference: Literally one of the most important essays could read, if you want to have a *productive* disagreements about anything, on X or anywhere else, is @paulg’s

another of the dudes going after me (Theo) is perhaps paid by OpenAI 🙄 He doesn’t work for them, but he likely has or has had some paid partnership with them, because they’ve invited him onto their ca

@GaryMarcus Can't agree more. OpenAI seems struggling to build any successful product after ChatGPT. Codex is promising but it's still early, and it's following Claude Code. It's questionable whether

@GaryMarcus I don't understand why the people running the AI companies are held to a much lower standard. In early 2025 Sam Altman wrote 'we are now confident we know how to build AGI.' As predictions

@GaryMarcus If OpenAI gets bailed out, I will lobby with all of my effort to ensure whatever political faction was responsible gets voted out. I'm about to become a single issue voter over AI because

Here’s a key line in this mythos update. This is precisely an example of why engineers don’t go away, ever. We’ve made it far easier to create and find security issues, which means the new bottleneck

I am deleting a question I had about @theo in light of his clarification. I hope that he and others will reconsider his/their own slander in light of my own clarifications, such as the one below that

I called both missteps and that’s part of why OpenAI and their shills hate me. 🤷‍♂️ @GaryMarcus It all went wrong with GPT-5 and Sora 2 IMO. Until then OpenAI could do no wrong in the eyes of most peo

“I have no idea why you tagged Paul Graham” means “I was too lazy to try to learn something”. Paul Graham’s piece on argumentation is brilliant, something everyone should learn from it. In the meantim

I love that this post, my most foulmouthed ever, has gotten over 100k views. You want to know why it has spread? Simple. Because a lot of people have become really fed up with OpenAI. Fuck this OpenAI

I once asked a bunch of e/accs how much damage was an acceptable risk relative to take (any) safety precautions. none answered. we may be about to find out. One implication of the below is that we rea

Gary Marcus expresses concern that AI-generated low-quality mathematical content ('AI slop') will proliferate, making the role of professional mathematicians increasingly important for quality control

it ain’t just me who sees the emperor has no clothes The AI bubble math doesn't add up. Anthropic spends 3 to make 1 and that’s before you include any and all other costs like staff or electricity. Mi

it’s truly astonishing to see the entire field move in the neurosymbolic and world model directions I advocated in 2019 and 2020 and then simultaneously see people claim (invariably without specific e

This essay discusses 'vibe slop,' a term describing low-quality AI-generated content that lacks substance but mimics the aesthetic and emotional tone of authentic creative work. The piece likely argue

Literally one of the most important essays could read, if you want to have a *productive* disagreements about anything, on X or anywhere else, is @paulg’s “How to Disagree”. It describes a pyramid. Ev