Search: “evaluation”

arXiv:2606.22269v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate the translation quality of current large language models (LLMs) for English-to-Hausa and English-to-Fongbe - two typologically distinct

arXiv:2603.11482v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating 'anime-like' voices currently relies on costly subjective judgments, yet no standardized objective metric exists. A key challenge i

arXiv:2602.09809v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scientific diagrams convey explicit structural information, yet modern text-to-image models often produce visually plausible but structurally incorr

arXiv:2507.00460v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Open Large Language Model (LLM) benchmarks, such as HELM and BIG-Bench, provide standardized and transparent evaluation protocols that support compa

arXiv:2606.03318v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite great advances in tool-use capabilities of large language models (LLMs), existing evaluation benchmarks struggle to fully align with real-world

arXiv:2606.02630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Patient-facing medical chatbots are commonly evaluated on single-turn prompts, yet real users push back after refusals, add urgency, and invoke author

arXiv:2507.08038v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Language model agents are increasingly used to automate scientific research, yet evaluating their scientific contributions remains a challenge

arXiv:2605.30394v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper introduces Code Bench, a benchmark capable of evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) concise code generation abilities in 60 programming l

arXiv:2605.29454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) are the prevailing method for identifying training data, their application has expanded into privacy auditing

arXiv:2605.29555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As candidate generation and high-throughput experimentation advance, the primary bottleneck in materials discovery is shifting from property prediction

arXiv:2605.29738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal NLP benchmarks overwhelmingly evaluate a single language or aggregate tasks that differ fundamentally across jurisdictions, making cross-lingual

arXiv:2506.04602v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The burgeoning growth of the esports and multiplayer online gaming community has highlighted the critical importance of evaluating the Most Va

arXiv:2605.30256v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Natural human conversation is full-duplex and audio-visual: people simultaneously speak and listen while continuously interpreting and producing nonve

arXiv:2605.27995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents have shown strong capabilities in using external tools to solve complex tasks. However, existing evaluations oft

arXiv:2605.28465v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Divergent thinking is a core dimension of creativity, yet existing evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) treat them as single-turn text generation

This post combines learnings from LangChain’s work on evaluating deep agents and Anthropic’s guide to demystifying evals for AI agents into a practical guide. In this post, you will learn how to: 1) a

arXiv:2308.04823v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper unveils CG-Eval, the first-ever comprehensive and automated evaluation framework designed for assessing the generative capabilities of la

arXiv:2605.27195v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chart-to-data extraction with vision-language models (VLMs) is increasingly evaluated on benchmarks that show diminishing headroom (frontier VLMs exceed

arXiv:2605.24110v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coding agents are increasingly used as iterative development partners, but most benchmarks still evaluate one specification followed by one final assess

arXiv:2602.18788v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce BURMESE-SAN, the first holistic benchmark that systematically evaluates large language models (LLMs) for Burmese across three core NLP

arXiv:2602.13372v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating moral alignment in agents navigating conflicting, hierarchically structured human norms is a critical challenge at the intersection

arXiv:2503.17599v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated considerable potential in general practice. However, existing benchmarks and evaluation frameworks pr

arXiv:2605.22469v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating single-concept personalization in text-to-image diffusion requires measuring both concept preservation, which captures identity fidelity to a

arXiv:2602.00122v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In recent years, image editing models have made significant progress, enabling users to manipulate visual content in a flexible and interactive mann

arXiv:2605.20127v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial vision models are often evaluated against the human visual cortex by measuring how accurately their internal representations predict brain

arXiv:2511.14159v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating the robustness of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) is essential for their continued development and responsible deployment in real-wo

arXiv:2605.17176v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotion understanding is a core capability for LLMs to interact effectively with humans, yet existing evaluation paradigms rely on discrete emotion labe

arXiv:2508.08501v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce GVGAI-LLM, a video game benchmark for evaluating the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Built

arXiv:2601.08118v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as human simulators, both for evaluating conversational systems and for generating fine-tuning da

arXiv:2605.17500v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative text-to-image models are typically trained on large-scale web-scraped datasets that include diverse visual content such as copyrighted and

In this post, you will implement four Lambda-based custom code evaluators for a financial market-intelligence agent, register each with AgentCore, and run them in on-demand and online modes. You will

arXiv:2605.16223v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative video models are increasingly used in design animation tasks, yet no standardized evaluation framework exists for this domain. Unlike natur

arXiv:2605.14641v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Class attribution maps (CAMs) provide local explanations for the decisions of convolutional neural networks. While widely used in practice, the evalua

arXiv:2601.05752v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce AutoMonitor-Bench, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the reliability of LLM-based misbehavior monitors across div

arXiv:2605.08432v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Calibration measures whether a model's predicted confidence aligns with its empirical accuracy, and is central to the reliable deployment of large lan

arXiv:2602.04189v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Uncertainty evaluation is critical in scientific and engineering inverse problems. However, existing benchmarks on Diffusion Inverse Solvers (DIS) p

arXiv:2605.10246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI scientist systems are increasingly deployed for autonomous research, yet their academic integrity has never been systematically evaluated. We introdu

arXiv:2605.06856v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI systems achieve impressive performance on standard benchmarks yet fail to deliver real-world utility, a disconnect we identify across 28

arXiv:2601.15050v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current evaluation methods for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) suffer from extit{factual myopia}: they relentlessly emphasize factual accuracy

arXiv:2605.07919v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical vision--language models (VLMs) are usually evaluated on intact image--question pairs, but trustworthy clinical use requires a stronger property:

arXiv:2605.07461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rubrics have been extensively utilized for evaluating unverifiable, open-ended tasks, with recent research incorporating them into reward systems for re

arXiv:2605.04208v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive multilingual capabilities for well-resourced languages, yet their performance on low-resource

arXiv:2505.18466v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook intersectional and culturally specific biases, particularly in underrepresented multiling

arXiv:2603.04601v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code generation has emerged as one of AI's highest-impact use cases, yet existing benchmarks measure isolated tasks rather than the complete '

arXiv:2605.01687v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present MultiBreak, a scalable and diverse multi-turn jailbreak benchmark to evaluate large language model (LLM) safety. Multi-turn jailbreaks mimic

arXiv:2512.01020v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains (e.g., law) is essential for ensuring credibility and explainabilit