Safety
Aligning Institutional Power and Operational Ability
arXiv:2610.37342v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To be socially sustainable, Agentic AI systems require normative designs that align responsibilities with the ability to fulfil them. Identifying incong
arXiv:2610.37342v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To be socially sustainable, Agentic AI systems require normative designs that align responsibilities with the ability to fulfil them. Identifying incongruences such as unsatisfiable expectations or privilege escalation is crucial in avoiding normative pitfalls. In this study, we discuss design dimensions suitable for describing multi-agent systems in light of this norm-ability alignment requirement. We propose a formal framework centred on process-oriented modelling and institutional power for the analysis of a given normatively relevant process, discuss strategies for repairing it, and elaborate on how the symmetrical relation between operational process and institutional state affects the lifecycle of normative positions.
Related
- Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good
- DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow
- PROBE: Learning to Audit Policy Compliance in Tool-Using LLM Agents
- Legislating World-Model-Based Planning with Legal Reasoning
- Computational Reflective Equilibrium for Agentic AI: A Rawlsian Alignment Scaffold for Governance
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-28