Safety
alternative theory: people who are good at training LLMs aren’t necessarily equally competent at calculating expected value.
alternative theory: people who are good at training LLMs aren’t necessarily equally competent at calculating expected value. I cannot imagine the cognitive dissonance it would take to keep working in
alternative theory: people who are good at training LLMs aren’t necessarily equally competent at calculating expected value. I cannot imagine the cognitive dissonance it would take to keep working in an industry if I sincerely thought the expected loss of human life was ~800 million, more than every genocidal dictator in history combined.
Related
- [[llms-are-good-at-math-style-problems-where-you-tell-them-a-b|LLMs are “ good at math style problems, where you tell them A, B and C are true, and then ask them to figure out D [but] extremely bad at an…]]
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-09-12