Agents
Completely agreed. Everyone in SF knows how good these models are at coding / work automation. When it comes to writing, there’s still a ins…
Completely agreed. Everyone in SF knows how good these models are at coding / work automation. When it comes to writing, there’s still a insane amount of model-generated AI slop because there’s no eas
Completely agreed. Everyone in SF knows how good these models are at coding / work automation. When it comes to writing, there’s still a insane amount of model-generated AI slop because there’s no easy, guided way for users to prompt and train models to write and communicate in a way that doesn’t evoke the “AI ick” Part of this is stylistic (em-dashes), but part of it is also the tooling around these models to help shape the user intent and communicate in a believable manner. Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a…
Related
- Beyond Functional Correctness: Design Issues in AI IDE-Generated Large-Scale Projects
- Agent responsibly
- tldr: everyone is converging on the same product shape: a general harness that takes a goal, uses tools, and does knowledge work. once every…
- Human judgment in the agent improvement loop
- Another banger article from the @LangChain team! Harness evolution combined with specialist local models will be the way forward undoubtedly…
Source: Jerry Liu (X) | 2026-04-10