Safety
Continual Reasoning Gym: Diagnosing and Harnessing Shared Reasoning in Continual RLVR
arXiv:2608.18574v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly post-trains reasoning models on multiple tasks, while rerunning multitask RLVR (MTRL) as
arXiv:2608.18574v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly post-trains reasoning models on multiple tasks, while rerunning multitask RLVR (MTRL) as new tasks are added makes capability expansion costly. We therefore study continual RLVR, which updates the existing model as each task arrives. The central question is whether a model updated this way can perform as well as a jointly trained model. To answer this question, we introduce Continual Reasoning Gym, a continual-RLVR environment that organizes text and visual reasoning tasks into five task sequences. In this setting, we identify two key observations: Sequential RLVR exhibits modest forgetting, yet its final performance remains below that of MTRL. To understand the latter, we decompose final performance and show that forgetting accounts for only part of the gap. To explain the former, we identify shared reasoning: transferable reasoning structure allows training on one task to support others on average. We therefore introduce Continual Prompt Replay (CPR), which harnesses shared reasoning to improve learning on the arriving and future tasks by replaying previous-task prompts and regenerating their responses with the current policy. On average, only CPR reaches MTRL-level performance.
Related
- Not only where, But when: Temporal Scheduling for RLVR
- Do Not Step Into the Same River Twice: Learning to Reason from Trial and Error
- One-Way Policy Optimization for Self-Evolving LLMs
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-08-20