Safety
Counterfactual Online Conformal Prediction Under Adaptive Logging
arXiv:2609.30811v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online conformal prediction can fail when predictions shape actions and actions determine which outcomes enter calibration. Standard adaptive methods ma
arXiv:2609.30811v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online conformal prediction can fail when predictions shape actions and actions determine which outcomes enter calibration. Standard adaptive methods may retain marginal coverage while systematically miscovering the counterfactual outcomes of rarely selected actions. This paper formalizes the failure through counterfactual coverage and introduces Propensity-Weighted Online Conformal Prediction, an inverse-propensity-weighted recursion that debiases calibration. A doubly robust variant further reduces nuisance bias to the product of outcome-model and propensity errors. Under positivity, the resulting coverage rate matches an information-theoretic lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Experiments on synthetic decision tasks, open bandit data, and financial rebalancing show that PW-OCP and DR-OCP improve counterfactual coverage and downstream regret without sacrificing prediction-set sharpness.
Related
- Optimal Spatio-Temporal Decoupling for Bayesian Conformal Prediction
- Bias-Corrected Adaptive Conformal Inference for Multi-Horizon Time Series Forecasting
- Online Conformal Prediction Beyond Feedback
- Online Conformal Prediction with Adversarial Semi-bandit Feedback via Regret Minimization
- Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-09-28