Cross-Lingual Alignment Without Joint Training: Do Monolingual Language Models Converge on Universal Representations?

arXiv:2608.27115v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-lingual alignment in multilingual language models is typically attributed to joint training: shared parameters, mixed-language batches, or explicit alignment objectives. We ask whether monolingual models trained on non-parallel data learn alignable representations without joint training. By testing on strictly monolingual language models, such as the Goldfish model families and independently developed models from different research labs, we find three results. Correlation: these models develop alignable representational geometry across layers, with alignment strengthening as data scale, model scale, or linguistic proximity increases. Construction: a single Procrustes rotation fit on parallel sentences maps hidden states between models. Causation: the same rotation transfers functional content; patching a rotated English residual into a German model on a factual cloze flips the prediction to the donor's capital in most cases. We confirm that cross-lingual alignment can emerge from the structure of language and the information it carries rather than from joint training, and this points to practical future directions including model stitching, merging, and modular multilingual systems built from monolingual components.

Related

• There is No Theoretical Curse of Multilinguality For Embedding Space Structure
• CLEAR: Cross-Lingual Enhancement in Alignment via Reverse-training
• Mechanistic Analysis of Alignment Algorithms in Language Models
• Semantic Alignment of AI Models: Concept Collapse, Checkpoint Dynamics, and Cross-Lingual Transfer

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-08-28