Safety
“Currently I believe that no lab has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed…
“Currently I believe that no lab has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer. I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns
“Currently I believe that no lab has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer. I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns to become commonplace until shared safety bars are established. And I believe that international coordination on future AI development needs to become a top priority for governments around the world” is pretty much everything I have been saying for the last few years. maybe now that @merettm from OpenAI is saying the same people will believe it? Jakub Pachocki, Chief Scientist OpenAI: 'Currently I believe that no lab has solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer. I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns to become commonplace until shared safet…
Related
- Counterpoint: “If alignment issues are becoming big enough that OpenAI is willing to commit 20% of research inference compute to chain-of-th…
- It is not literally impossible to pause or slow down. It is a choice. But if the “frontier labs” continue to refuse to do, I strongly believ…
- 'We're going to reach a point of diminishing returns from scaling. That's what actually happened. The industry knows this. But doesn't want …
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-09-06