Safety
👇@davidSacks raises some interesting points here, which deserve an answer, but arguably gets the solution exactly backwards. Are we not now…
👇@davidSacks raises some interesting points here, which deserve an answer, but arguably gets the solution exactly backwards. Are we not now already leaving unelected private companies precisely the ab
👇@davidSacks raises some interesting points here, which deserve an answer, but arguably gets the solution exactly backwards. Are we not now already leaving unelected private companies precisely the ability to censor surveil and control citizens, and even sanctioning private companies for refusing to commit to using their systems in the service of government surveillance? The Pope rightly warns that AI must serve human dignity, not become a tool of domination or exclusion. But if we hand governments sweeping power over AI development in the name of safety, how do we prevent it from being used to censor, surveil, and control citizens — as Orwell fo…
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-05-25