Safety
Dependable AI-Assisted Engineering: A Formal Framework for AI Participation and Assurance in Safety-Critical Workflows
arXiv:2610.04084v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI can produce engineering artefacts, but generation alone does not determine whether or how those artefacts should enter safety-critical wor
arXiv:2610.04084v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI can produce engineering artefacts, but generation alone does not determine whether or how those artefacts should enter safety-critical workflows. This paper develops a formal framework for assigning AI participation and assurance at the level of individual workflow units. Each unit has a participation and assurance record covering its engineering requirement, an approved operational formalization where applicable, the applicable mechanism, fallback where applicable, evidence obligations and the applicable guarantee, plus a deployment-readiness status. The framework distinguishes deterministic verification, statistically calibrated admission, authorized human judgement supported by AI advice, authorized human adjudication of AI-produced artefacts, retained deterministic tool paths and explicit non-participation; these arrangements carry different kinds of guarantee rather than levels on a common scale. The framework also separates formalization fidelity from verifier soundness, provides a staged classification and readiness procedure, and derives conditions for comparing a gated AI-assisted unit with an incumbent process under recurring-population assumptions. We instantiate and apply the framework in an executed 17-unit wing-spar structural-analysis workflow combining deterministically gated AI-generated CAD, retained deterministic computation and human judgement. The AI-generated CAD program passed all 23 deterministic checks and was admitted at the first attempt. Favourable stress magnitudes did not suffice to pass the stress criteria where the predeclared mesh-convergence evidence was insufficient; those criteria were instead referred to engineering judgement. The case demonstrates selective AI participation and explicit evidence handling at unit level; no claim is made of workflow-level dependability, certification, structural safety or productivity.
Related
- Where Should Knowledge Enter? A Layered Framework for Knowledge Infusion in Multimodal Iterative Generative Mo
- Harmful Content Generation in Text-to-Image Models: Capabilities and Moderation Limitations
- Risk-Controllable Multi-View Diffusion for Driving Scenario Generation
- C-GenReg: Training-Free 3D Point Cloud Registration by Multi-View-Consistent Geometry-to-Image Generation with Probabilistic Modalities Fusion
Source: arXiv cs.CV | 2026-10-06