Do LLMs Benefit From Their Own Words?

arXiv:2602.24287v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In multi-turn conversations, large language models typically condition on the full conversation history: both past user prompts and assistant responses. We revisit this design choice by comparing full-context prompting to four alternative, substantially-reduced context configurations. Analyzing in-the-wild multi-turn conversations across three open reasoning and one state-of-the-art model, we find that response quality is largely preserved under aggressive context filtering: replacing all prior assistant turns with one-sentence summaries or keeping only the most recent user--assistant exchange often matches storing full context in performance while using roughly 8x less context. To understand this result, we observe that a substantial fraction of user turns (36.4%) in multi-turn conversations are self-contained and that many follow-up turns can be addressed by seeing only the immediately preceding user--assistant exchange. Furthermore, we find that when models condition on their own past responses, this can lead to context pollution, a phenomenon in which reasoning errors, hallucinations, or stylistic artifacts propagate across turns. Motivated by these findings, we design a context-filtering approach that selectively omits the assistant-side history. Taken together, these findings suggest moving away from storing full dialogue transcripts and instead retaining only what is relevant.

Related

• Understanding the Challenges in Iterative Generative Optimization with LLMs
• Making Expert Reasoning Learnable with Self-Distillation
• ChatSOP: An SOP-Guided MCTS Planning Framework for Controllable LLM Dialogue Agents

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-12