Research

Do you want to know why LLMs feel sharp on surface semantics but hollow on the fine-grained stuff? “From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Hu…

Do you want to know why LLMs feel sharp on surface semantics but hollow on the fine-grained stuff? “From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaning” Come by the poster tomor

DGX agentx-post
researchyann-lecun--x

Do you want to know why LLMs feel sharp on surface semantics but hollow on the fine-grained stuff? “From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaning” Come by the poster tomorrow at #ICLR2026 - Fri, Apr 24, 6:30–9:00 AM PDT (10:30AM local time!), Pavilion 3, P3-#1017 to know the answer! We think it's because they overcompress. Humans keep "inefficient" concepts due to nuance. LLMs discard those for cleaner, information-theoretic compression. Different objectives yield different representations. Using an Information Bottleneck lens across 40+ models, we also found that encoders align with humans better than decoders many times their size, and that during training, semantic processing migrates from deep layers to mid-network as the model discovers sparser encodings. @ChenShani2 Liron Soffer @jurafsky @ylecun

Related

Source: Yann LeCun (X) | 2026-04-23

Loading related sources…