Encoded but Not Actionable: Auditing the Decode-Generate-Steer Gap in Frozen LLMs for Geometric Constraints

arXiv:2608.17843v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on structured reasoning tasks, but what they encode and whether it informs model behavior remain unclear. We investigate this question through geometric reasoning, using parametric CAD constraints as a controlled testbed for separating local pairwise relations from sketch-level constraint status. By probing the hidden states of six frozen decoder-only LLMs, we examine four properties: linear decodability, forced-choice generation, activation-level influence, and behavioral steerability. Pretraining substantially improves the decoding of local geometric relations, and this advantage persists after accounting for positional cues with shuffled-order controls. In contrast, sketch-level DOF status is already highly decodable from randomly initialized representations and improves only modestly with pretraining, indicating that much of its probe performance is available without learned weights. Further analyses show that decodable information is not always actionable. Generation often fails to express this information, and on the two intervention-tested backbones, activation-restoration effects at the patched entity position vanish while decodability persists across depth. Mean-difference steering also does not reliably control outputs. These results show that decodability, generation, activation-level influence, and steerability can diverge in the tested setting. The audit provides a controlled way to distinguish failures to encode geometric structure from failures to express or control encoded information.

Related

• ContextGuard: Structured Self-Auditing for Context Learning in Language Models
• Limits of Spatial Imagery Reasoning in Frontier LLM Models
• How Context Shapes Truth: Geometric Transformations of Statement-level Truth Representations in LLMs

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-19