EVAR: Evidence-Validated Hypothesis Admission for Budget-Aware Narrative Reasoning

arXiv:2608.29835v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce fluent but weakly grounded conclusions when reasoning over non-interactive, long-form narratives. A central failure mode is that unsupported intermediate hypotheses can enter the reasoning trajectory and contaminate subsequent inference, especially when evidence is scattered across distant parts of the story. To address this problem, we propose EVAR, an evidence-validated hypothesis admission framework for budget-aware narrative reasoning. EVAR first compiles the narrative into an immutable evidence store of source-linked atomic claims and assigns an instance-specific inference budget from unresolved gaps and uncertainty signals. During refinement, EVAR directly proposes candidate hypotheses for unresolved gaps, constructs hypothesis-conditioned validation challenges, and verifies each candidate against the locked store before admission: supported hypotheses enter the answer-supporting state, unverifiable ones are quarantined, and contradictory ones are discarded. A sufficiency-based stopping mechanism further avoids unnecessary refinement. Experiments on NarraCrime and multiple public reasoning benchmarks show that EVAR improves both task performance and evidence faithfulness while maintaining controllable inference cost.

Related

• Think Through Uncertainty: Improving Long-Form Generation Factuality via Reasoning Calibration
• Twin Worlds: Equivariance-Based Abstention for Evidence-Grounded Reasoning
• HaluNet: Learning Hallucination Risk from Internal Signals in LLM Question Answering
• Pause or Fabricate? Training Language Models for Grounded Reasoning
• Dustin: Draft-Augmented Sparse Verification for Efficient Long-Context Generation with Speculative Decoding

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-09-01