Exploring Teachers' Perspectives on Using Conversational AI Agents for Group Collaboration

arXiv:2602.07142v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Collaboration is a cornerstone of 21st-century learning, yet teachers continue to face challenges in supporting productive peer interaction. Emerging generative AI tools offer new possibilities for scaffolding collaboration, but their role in mediating in-person group work remains underexplored, especially from the perspective of educators. This paper presents findings from an exploratory qualitative study with 33 K12 teachers who interacted with Phoenix, a voice-based conversational agent designed to function as a near-peer in face-to-face group collaboration. Drawing on playtesting sessions, surveys, and focus groups, we examine how teachers perceived the agent's behavior, its influence on group dynamics, and its classroom potential. While many appreciated Phoenix's capacity to stimulate engagement, they also expressed concerns around autonomy, trust, anthropomorphism, and pedagogical alignment. We contribute empirical insights into teachers' mental models of AI, reveal core design tensions, and outline considerations for group-facing AI agents that support meaningful, collaborative learning.

Related

• AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society
• Front-End Ethics for Sensor-Fused Health Conversational Agents: An Ethical Design Space for Biometrics
• WebSP-Eval: Evaluating Web Agents on Website Security and Privacy Tasks
• Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-13