Research
Factorized AdaBoost.MH Achieves the Same Convergence Rate as AdaBoost.MH
arXiv:2608.01091v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AdaBoost.MH reduces multi-class classification to a collection of binary subproblems and enjoys the classical boosting-type convergence guarantee under
arXiv:2608.01091v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AdaBoost.MH reduces multi-class classification to a collection of binary subproblems and enjoys the classical boosting-type convergence guarantee under a weak learning condition. A more structured variant, Factorized AdaBoost.MH, uses base classifiers of the form mathbf{h}(x)=alpha mathbf{v} m{arphi}(x), where a single binary classifier m{arphi} is shared across all classes and the label dependence is carried by a vote vector mathbf{v} in{pm1}^K. This factorization is algorithmically attractive and achieves better performance in practice, but its convergence depends on whether one can always choose a vote vector with sufficiently large induced binary weight mass. Previous work resolved this question with a lower bound max{1/n,1/sqrt{2K}}, which still leaves a dimension-dependent slowdown relative to the original AdaBoost.MH analysis. In this paper, we sharpen this combinatorial step. For the minimax quantity mathfrak{W}{n,K} governing the factorized edge, we prove max{1/n,C_K}lemathfrak{W}{n,K}le C_{min{n,K}}, where C_q=1 for q=1, C_q=q/(3q-4) for even qge2, and C_q=(q+1)/(3q-1) for odd qge2. Since C_qownarrow 1/3, our bounds show that mathfrak{W}_{n,K}=Theta(1) uniformly over n and K. Consequently, Factorized AdaBoost.MH achieves the same boosting-type convergence rate as AdaBoost.MH up to a universal constant factor, removing the previously suggested additional dependence on n or K in the number of boosting rounds.
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-08-04