Fairness Theatre: Evaluating Post-Hoc Fairness Interventions in Vendor-Controlled Early Warning Systems

arXiv:2609.38552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public institutions increasingly procure AI systems whose design they cannot inspect or change. In higher education, proprietary Early Warning Systems (EWS) leave colleges with few options beyond adjusting model outputs to address inequity. This raises the question of how fairness work is coordinated among vendors, institutions, advisors, and students with unequal power to change these systems? Using student records from a public college in Ontario, Canada, we evaluate six post-hoc fairness interventions on a research EWS under simulated procurement constraints. We compare fairness, accuracy, and demographic disparities, introducing error-type profiling to trace how interventions redistribute false positives and false negatives. Interventions redistributed disparities without consistently reducing them. Two implementations favored already-advantaged groups because they used group size to define disadvantage; small, marginalized groups remained poorly served. These findings show how procurement constraints and implementation choices shape the possibilities for fairness work. We call the resulting condition fairness theatre; dashboard metrics converge while groups' error burdens persist or worsen.

Related

• Fairness Definitions and Metrics in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Drug Discovery in Healthcare: A Rapid Evidence Review
• FairJudge: Abstention-Aware Multimodal Judges for Fairness and Alignment Evaluation in Text-to-Image Models
• Fair and Calibrated Toxicity Detection with Robust Training and Abstention

Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-10-01