Safety
Fork-dLLM: Avoiding the Flexibility Trap in Diffusion Language Models
arXiv:2609.39859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Masked diffusion language models (dLLMs) have shown strong potential for faster inference through parallel token generation when combined with confidenc
arXiv:2609.39859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Masked diffusion language models (dLLMs) have shown strong potential for faster inference through parallel token generation when combined with confidence-based samplers. However, recent work has shown that such methods can defer unmasking high-entropy fork positions at which multiple plausible continuations exist. This results in reduced generation diversity, as shown by worse pass@k scaling, and limits gains obtainable from RL post-training. To avoid this flexibility trap, prior work advocated for autoregressive (AR) sampling. Here, we show that discarding confidence-based sampling is unnecessary and, once inference cost is taken into account, wasteful. We first propose Fork-dLLM, a simple hybrid sampler that uses AR-style ordering only at uncertain fallback steps while retaining parallel generation otherwise. We then extend the same principle to post-training with ForkGRPO, which uses Fork-dLLM rollouts and applies the GRPO objective only at fallback steps, preserving exact policy-likelihood ratios while substantially reducing rollout and optimization cost. In our experiments, Fork-dLLM matches the strong pass@k scaling of AR sampling while being 2-3x more efficient, and ForkGRPO achieves downstream performance comparable to or better than AR-based GRPO baselines at a substantially lower training cost.
Related
- LEAP: Unlocking dLLM Parallelism via Lookahead Early-Convergence Token Detection
- Low-Confidence Remasking Traps Flexibility: Realizing Arbitrary-Order Potential for Diverse Rollouts in Diffusion LLMs
- The Flexibility Trap: Rethinking the Value of Arbitrary Order in Diffusion Language Models
- Learning Unmasking Policies for Diffusion Language Models
- The Path Matters: Learning a Token-Commitment Policy for Diffusion Language Models
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-10-01