From Vibe to Code -- and Back: Lexical Oscillation in the Formation of Design Intent with Generative AI

arXiv:2607.23126v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI design tools make natural-language prompts a starting point for design, placing new articulation demands on designers. Rather than treating prompts as the transmission of pre-existing design intent, we ask how design intent is formed through situated interaction with AI. Five expert UI/UX designers (11-20 years' experience, M = 15.4) designed landing-page hero sections with a generative AI tool, recorded through think-aloud and retrospective interviews. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we used lexical granularity (L1 vibe, L2 design-domain, L3 operational language) as a sensitizing lens. Rather than moving from vibe to code unidirectionally, designers showed lexical oscillation, including returns from operational specificity to ambiguity. Mismatches with AI outputs were taken up as occasions for designers to reconsider what they meant, and engagement shifted from instruction to consultation. One non-oscillating trajectory -- a negative case -- suggested conceptual misalignment as a tentative boundary for future examination. We position AI as a non-neutral generative interlocutor and ambiguity as a resource for design judgment.

Related

• Vibe Coding in Product Teams: Reconfiguring AI-Assisted Workflows, Prototyping, and Collaboration
• A Guiding Framework for K-12 Teachers in Creating AI-powered Learning Technologies through Vibe Coding
• They Infer What You Meant: Models Represent Communicative Intent More Reliably Than They Act On It
• To LLM, or Not to LLM: How Designers and Developers Navigate LLMs as Tools or Teammates

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-07-28