How Reliable are AMR Parser Outputs? Uncertainty Estimation for AMR Parsing

arXiv:2610.13236v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances have significantly improved the performance of Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) parsers, yet determining when their outputs can be trusted remains largely unexplored. This work presents the first study of uncertainty estimation for AMR parsers in a black-box setting using top-k beam-search candidates. Uncertainty is estimated from pairwise candidate similarities and evaluated using the Prediction Rejection Ratio. This work characterises the relationship between parsing performance and uncertainty, evaluates the reliability of beam candidate distributions, analyses the effect of evaluation metrics on uncertainty assessment, and identifies parsers that provide the strongest balance between performance and reliability. Experimental results show the value of uncertainty estimation as a complementary dimension for evaluating AMR parsers.

Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs
When Confidence Fails: Overconfidence in LLMs under Uncertainty and Missing Clinical Information
Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertainty
Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models
From Answers to Interpretations: Rethinking Ambiguity-Induced Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-12

Related