How VLAs (Really) Work In Open-World Environments

arXiv:2604.21192v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action models (VLAs) have been extensively used in robotics applications, achieving great success in various manipulation problems. More recently, VLAs have been used in long-horizon tasks and evaluated on benchmarks, such as BEHAVIOR1K (B1K), for solving complex household chores. The common metric for measuring progress in such benchmarks is success rate or partial score based on satisfaction of progress-agnostic criteria, meaning only the final states of the objects are considered, regardless of the events that lead to such states. In this paper, we argue that using such evaluation protocols say little about safety aspects of operation and can potentially exaggerate reported performance, undermining core challenges for future real-world deployment. To this end, we conduct a thorough analysis of state-of-the-art models on the B1K Challenge and evaluate policies in terms of robustness via reproducibility and consistency of performance, safety aspects of policies operations, task awareness, and key elements leading to the incompletion of tasks. We then propose evaluation protocols to capture safety violations to better measure the true performance of the policies in more complex and interactive scenarios. At the end, we discuss the limitations of the existing VLAs and motivate future research.

Related

• EmbodiedMidtrain: Bridging the Gap between Vision-Language Models and Vision-Language-Action Models via Mid-training
• VLA-Forget: Vision-Language-Action Unlearning for Embodied Foundation Models
• Learning Vision-Language-Action World Models for Autonomous Driving
• Environmental Understanding Vision-Language Model for Embodied Agent
• Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-24