Research
Human-Like Attention? A Psychophysical Comparison of Visual Search in Humans and MLLMs
arXiv:2610.05463v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual search is a fundamental cognitive ability. This study investigates whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exhibit human-like difficul
arXiv:2610.05463v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual search is a fundamental cognitive ability. This study investigates whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exhibit human-like difficulty signatures in visual search tasks. We compared search performance of humans (n = 1,250) and MLLMs using identical 2D and 3D stimuli across different set sizes. Both groups showed efficient performance in feature searches, most clearly when the target had a unique color, but performance degradation in conjunction searches as set sizes increased. Additionally, we found strong correlations between human and MLLM error rates (rho = 0.82), which suggests that MLLMs are sensitive to similar objective complexities, such as stimulus heterogeneity. However, differences were found as well: whereas humans invested extra search time to respond accurately on target-absent trials, MLLMs exhibited extreme present/absent response biases in complex searches. We conclude that MLLMs replicate high-level human performance signatures, yet their underlying computations differ significantly.
Related
- When Looking Is Not Enough: Visual Attention Structure Reveals Hallucination in MLLMs
- From Attenuation to Attention: Variational Information Flow Manipulation for Fine-Grained Visual Perception
- BVS: Bayesian Visual Search with Multimodal Large Language Model for Fine-grained Perception
Source: arXiv cs.CV | 2026-10-06