Safety
If they truly believe the risk is that high, and I think they do, then we need 100x more research and understanding of it. That requires the…
If they truly believe the risk is that high, and I think they do, then we need 100x more research and understanding of it. That requires them to openly share their models, datasets, training code, and
If they truly believe the risk is that high, and I think they do, then we need 100x more research and understanding of it. That requires them to openly share their models, datasets, training code, and agent traces. Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
Related
- AI safety can't happen behind closed doors! Super cool to see that the @AISecurityInst is releasing its evals, datasets, and models in the o…
- Looking forward to this ecosystem with open models continuing to flourish and grow with NVIDIA and Hugging Face, and the continued partnersh…
- AI systems that are accessible or even better open-source are safer for a simple reason: more people can inspect them, test them, stress the…
- APIs and limited releases for AI models are not a safety policy, they’re a business model (which is totally ok as long as you’re transparent…
Source: Clem Delangue (X) | 2026-09-09