Safety
Improving Semantic Uncertainty Quantification in Language Model Question-Answering via Token-Level Temperature Scaling
arXiv:2604.07172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Calibration is central to reliable semantic uncertainty quantification, yet prior work has largely focused on discrimination, neglecting calibration. As
arXiv:2604.07172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Calibration is central to reliable semantic uncertainty quantification, yet prior work has largely focused on discrimination, neglecting calibration. As calibration and discrimination capture distinct aspects of uncertainty, focusing on discrimination alone yields an incomplete picture. We address this gap by systematically evaluating both aspects across a broad set of confidence measures. We show that current approaches, particularly fixed-temperature heuristics, produce systematically miscalibrated and poorly discriminative semantic confidence distributions. We demonstrate that optimising a single scalar temperature, which, we argue, provides a suitable inductive bias, is a surprisingly simple yet effective solution. Our exhaustive evaluation confirms that temperature scaling consistently improves semantic calibration, discrimination, and downstream entropy, outperforming both heuristic baselines and more expressive token-level recalibration methods on question-answering tasks.
Related
- Limits of Difficulty Scaling: Hard Samples Yield Diminishing Returns in GRPO-Tuned SLMs
- Geometric Properties of the Voronoi Tessellation in Latent Semantic Manifolds of Large Language Models
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-04-10