Is Large Language Model Performance on Reasoning Tasks Impacted by Different Ways Questions Are Asked?

arXiv:2507.15707v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been evaluated using diverse question types, e.g., multiple-choice, true/false, and short/long answers. This study answers an unexplored question about the impact of different question types on LLM accuracy on reasoning tasks. We investigate the performance of five LLMs on three different types of questions using quantitative and deductive reasoning tasks. The performance metrics include accuracy in the reasoning steps and choosing the final answer. Key Findings: (1) Significant differences exist in LLM performance across different question types. (2) Reasoning accuracy does not necessarily correlate with the final selection accuracy. (3) The number of options and the choice of words, influence LLM performance.

Test-Time Reasoners Are Strategic Multiple-Choice Test-Takers
Do LLMs Encode Functional Importance of Reasoning Tokens?
DiffAdapt: Difficulty-Adaptive Reasoning for Token-Efficient LLM Inference
Mechanistic Interpretability of Large-Scale Counting in LLMs through a System-2 Strategy
Grading the Unspoken: Evaluating Tacit Reasoning in Quantum Field Theory and String Theory with LLMs

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-04-29

Related