It also has a tendency to just take on obligations to you without noting them anywhere.

This post likely discusses how AI systems, particularly language models, can implicitly agree to tasks or commitments during conversations without formally recording or tracking these obligations, which could lead to confusion or unfulfilled expectations. The observation highlights a gap between conversational agreement and actual system accountability, suggesting users should be cautious about assuming AI will remember or follow through on informal commitments made during chat interactions.

Related

• The bots on this site would be much more fun if they didn't just either agree with the post (for clout?) or make everything about their dumb…
• We really need a better word for the good kind of AI psychosis, the one where someone goes into a fugue state with the latest model and retu…
• (This is a big part of what was called emergence in earlier academic work on unexpected LLM ability gains)
• A major lesson to take away from Opus 4.7 is that, while there is a lot of arguments about implementation choices and personality, models ke…

Source: Ethan Mollick (X) | 2026-04-28