It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMs

arXiv:2608.13328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Professional communication is increasingly mediated by LLMs - but do these models serve all users equally? We show that when prompts contain linguistic features more commonly used by women (hedges, tag questions, collective reference), they systematically elicit shorter, less sophisticated, and less formal responses across three document types and four models. These effects persist after controlling for prompt complexity and feature carry-over. Explicit gender cues like sign-off names are encoded in the same representational space as linguistic dialect - suggesting shared underlying mechanisms - yet linguistic register is far more influential, producing large, consistent effects where names produce none. Our results further reveal that post-hoc mitigation is challenging: because these patterns are culturally embedded and outside conscious control, users cannot easily avoid them through strategic self-presentation, and mechanistic analysis reveals that linguistic features are encoded in early transformer layers and entangled with other features. Our work calls for upstream consideration of the influences of linguistic variation to mitigate disparate impacts of LLM-mediated workplace communication.

Related

• Context Matters: Auditing Gender Bias in T2I Generation through Risk-Tiered Use-Case Profiles
• Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
• Large Language Models Reproduce Racial Stereotypes When Used for Text Annotation

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-14