Research
Language, Language Models, and What We're Talking About
arXiv:2609.03577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are commonly discussed as technical artefacts, but they are obviously shaped by the linguistic worlds conveyed by data during their trai
arXiv:2609.03577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are commonly discussed as technical artefacts, but they are obviously shaped by the linguistic worlds conveyed by data during their training. Using Italian language models as evidence, I want to bring attention to the nature of the systems which result from training and specialising models on translated and synthetic data, and further curating them, and to the meaning of testing them on equally unnatural data. Are these eventually models of Italian? Are they models of language? Does NLP still care about language? These questions yield another, more concrete question: what language do we actually want language models to produce? I argue that this question cannot be answered if we do not first consider a clearer distinction between language models designed as technical products and language models designed as tools for studying language itself. The answers then might be diverse, the languages we are talking about might be diverse, and the picture might not be as pessimistic as we fear.
Related
- Large Language Models as Modal Models in Linguistics
- How Hypocritical Is Your LLM judge? Listener-Speaker Asymmetries in the Pragmatic Competence of Large Language Models
- LingoLoop Attack: Trapping MLLMs via Linguistic Context and State Entrapment into Endless Loops
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-09-04