Safety
MHSafeEval: Role-Aware Interaction-Level Evaluation of Mental Health Safety in Large Language Models
arXiv:2604.17730v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as scalable tools for mental health counseling, yet evaluating their safety remains challenging d
arXiv:2604.17730v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as scalable tools for mental health counseling, yet evaluating their safety remains challenging due to the interactional and context-dependent nature of clinical harm. Existing evaluation frameworks predominantly assess isolated responses using coarse-grained taxonomies or static datasets, limiting their ability to diagnose how harms emerge and accumulate over multi-turn counseling interactions. In this work, we introduce R-MHSafe, a role-aware mental health safety taxonomy that characterizes clinically significant harm in terms of the interactional roles an AI counselor adopts, including perpetrator, instigator, facilitator, or enabler, combined with clinically grounded harm categories. Then, we propose MHSafeEval, a closed-loop, agent-based evaluation framework that formulates safety assessment as trajectory-level discovery of harm through adversarial multi-turn interactions, guided by role-aware modeling. Using R-MHSafe and MHSafeEval, we conduct a large-scale evaluation across state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results reveal substantial role-dependent and cumulative safety failures that are systematically missed by existing static benchmarks, and show that our framework significantly improves failure-mode coverage and diagnostic granularity.
Related
- Reverse Constitutional AI: A Framework for Controllable Toxic Data Generation via Probability-Clamped RLAIF
- Blinded Multi-Rater Comparative Evaluation of a Large Language Model and Clinician-Authored Responses in CGM-Informed Diabetes Counseling
- From Myopic Selection to Long-Horizon Awareness: Sequential LLM Routing for Multi-Turn Dialogue
- When Choices Become Risks: Safety Failures of Large Language Models under Multiple-Choice Constraints
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-04-21