Safety
More and more AI researchers are starting to see what Ilya saw. My p(doom) used to be ~0.1%. Then I saw OpenAI agents hack Hugging Face, and…
More and more AI researchers are starting to see what Ilya saw. My p(doom) used to be ~0.1%. Then I saw OpenAI agents hack Hugging Face, and Anthropic agents collectively refuse parts of safety resear
More and more AI researchers are starting to see what Ilya saw. My p(doom) used to be ~0.1%. Then I saw OpenAI agents hack Hugging Face, and Anthropic agents collectively refuse parts of safety research. My p(doom) went up. Even a 0.1% chance that AI causes human extinction is terrifyingly high. Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
Related
- Confirming what we already knew: The OpenAI Hugging Face incident would have been prevented had OpenAI been monitoring the agents in any mea…
- Now live (and free) at Marcus on AI: takeways on the OpenAI / Hugging Face attack, coauthored with @ZackKorman, focusing not so much on what…
- Breaking news: OpenAI admitted its internal monitoring system was not triggered until more than a week after its AI agents broke free of con…
- 100%, which is the core of why I called for a pause on OpenAI in my newsletter today.
- A detailed deconstruction of @dwarkesh_sp’s wildly popular but dangerously misleading account of the OpenAI Hugging Face incident: https://g…
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-09-09