Occluded Oculus: Operationalizing Stylistic Obscurement

arXiv:2607.24411v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What did it take for Hermes, the devout messenger of the Olympian gods, to slay Argus Panoptes, the multi-eyed giant of Greek myth? As the perfect guardian, Panoptes' legion of ever-watchful eyes proved difficult -- but not impossible -- to defeat. The centerpiece of Hermes' strategy was obfuscation and sabotage. Posing as a shepherd, Hermes sealed each of Panoptes' eyes -- eyes that would otherwise have alerted the fearsome giant to Hermes' plot -- and vanquished him. The moral of the story: when a challenger must surmount a formidable foe -- one far greater in stature and vastly more equipped -- crafty maneuvers are not merely advisable but indispensable for victory. In this work, the "challenger" is a collective leveraging adversarial tactics to overcome the "multi-eyed giant" of stylometric systems and surveillance apparatuses. To successfully claw back the privacy siphoned by the multi-eyed giant, the challenger must carefully evaluate their plan of attack, extit{TraceTarnish}, and determine what does and does not work to anonymize the authorship of text. To that end, we conduct an ablation study of extit{TraceTarnish} to better understand which module -- Translation, Obfuscation, Imitation, or Injection -- best confounds a stylometric system. Our results indicate that the most effective approach was Injection, meaning that inserting zero-width Unicode characters, homoglyphs, and intentional misspellings neutralizes the indefatigable eyes long enough to claim the head of the all-seeing giant.

Related

• You Are What You Say: Exploiting Linguistic Content for VoicePrivacy Attacks
• Learning What to Forget: Improving LLM Unlearning via Learned Token-Level Importance
• What Does the Server See? Understanding Privacy Leakage from Large Language Models in Split Inference

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-07-28