Safety
Participation-Sensitive Convergence and the Fragment First, Converge Later Pattern in Asynchronous Online Learning: A Topological Analysis Across 22 OULAD Courses
arXiv:2610.01738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Asynchronous online learning offers temporal flexibility at a structural cost: learning communities tend to fragment rather than cohere. eta_0, the nu
arXiv:2610.01738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Asynchronous online learning offers temporal flexibility at a structural cost: learning communities tend to fragment rather than cohere. eta_0, the number of disconnected behavioral clusters from Zigzag Persistent Homology, serves as a cohort-level indicator of this structure. Two questions remained unverified at scale: (1) does apparent eta_0 convergence reflect genuine behavioral alignment or learner dropout? and (2) do assessment deadlines produce reproducible fragmentation-convergence cycles? We address both across all 22 OULAD courses (N > 22,000; 857 week-pairs). Changes in eta_0 strongly co-vary with active learner changes (pooled r = 0.387; median per-course r_delta = 0.459, 20/22 courses), identifying eta_0 as a participation-sensitive indicator: eta_0 and active learner counts co-respond to deadline events rather than one causing the other. Deadlines produced fragmentation in 82.6% of assessments and the full Fragment First, Converge Later (FFCL) cycle in 60.2%. 3-phase analysis confirmed structural fragmentation as the dominant long-term trajectory (90.9% of courses), moderated by curriculum structure. These findings establish eta_0 as a participation-sensitive structural indicator with direct implications for AI-augmented learning analytics design.
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-10-02