Safety

Physical Simulators as Do-Operators: Causal Discovery under Latent Confounders for AI-for-Science

arXiv:2605.07467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing interventional causal discovery methods -- IGSP, DCDI, ENCO -- assume causal sufficiency (no latent confounders) and rely on virtual interven

DGX agentpaper
safetyarxiv-cs-ai

arXiv:2605.07467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing interventional causal discovery methods -- IGSP, DCDI, ENCO -- assume causal sufficiency (no latent confounders) and rely on virtual interventions in synthetic simulators. In AI-for-Science settings such as molecular design and materials science, latent confounders are ubiquitous and real interventions (e.g., physics-based simulations) require hours to days per data point. We propose CFM-SD (Causal Flow Matching with Simulation Data), which uses first-principles physical simulators as do-operators in Pearl's interventional calculus to simultaneously handle latent confounders and real interventional data. Theoretically, d-variable causal structure is identifiable with O(d) single-variable interventions -- the minimum under physical realizability constraints. In Intrinsic Evaluation on synthetic data (gamma=0.2--0.8), CFM-SD achieves average F1=0.800 vs. F1=0.127--0.562 for all baselines. In Extrinsic Evaluation on real scientific data, CFM-SD achieves 57--58% bias reduction in molecular toxicity prediction and battery electrolyte optimization, demonstrating practical value beyond synthetic benchmarks.

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-05-11

Loading related sources…