Pretraining and Test-Time Training Budgets Matter for ARC: A Controlled Study of VARC and TRM

arXiv:2610.13660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) is increasingly used to evaluate whether neural networks can infer task-specific transformations from few demonstrations. Recent ARC models differ in architecture, but also in broader training and evaluation protocols, including pretraining data, data augmentation, test-time setup, and optimization budgets, making conclusions about architecture benefits debatable. In this work, we study how the performance of the vision-inspired VARC and recursion-based TRM models is affected by pretraining and test-time training (TTT) budgets under a common inductive protocol on ARC-AGI-1. We cross five pretraining budgets with four TTT budgets for each test task. Each budget specifies a task-variant count and total sample presentations, defining the controlled training budgets. We observe that increasing TTT sample presentations improves the standard ARC pass@2 metric in all settings for both models. Increasing the TTT task-variant count consistently helps only TRM, whereas VARC often performs better with fewer variants. VARC also remains competitive without pretraining, while TRM benefits much more from it. These results show that pretraining and TTT budgets affect ARC evaluation and motivate reporting at comparable budgets.

Related

• Implicit Rule Induction with Test-Time Task Embeddings in ARC-like Tasks
• The Power of Test-Time Training for Approximate Sampling
• Online Reasoning Calibration: Test-Time Training Enables Generalizable Conformal LLM Reasoning

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-12