Research
RAGScope: A Leakage-Controlled, Cost-Aware Evidence-Gating Protocol for RAG Hallucination Triage
arXiv:2609.39075v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems need inexpensive ways to route generated answers: accept low-risk outputs, review uncertain ones, and res
arXiv:2609.39075v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems need inexpensive ways to route generated answers: accept low-risk outputs, review uncertain ones, and reserve strong verifiers for the expensive tail. We present RAGScope, a leakage-controlled protocol for evaluating local evidence gates that use only the task input, retrieved context, and answer text. The protocol combines context-grouped splits, fold-scoped preprocessing, group bootstrap intervals, deployment operating points, end-to-end runtime, and explicit source-shift stress tests. On three RAGTruth tasks, the enhanced gate RAGScope-E reaches 0.798 AUROC and 0.660 average precision (AP) in pooled grouped cross-validation. Its pooled AP exceeds ROUGE-L by 0.034 with a 95% context-group interval of [0.002, 0.064], although the AUROC gain is not significant and ROUGE-L remains stronger on data-to-text. At a top-10% review budget, RAGScope-E attains 0.748 precision; accepting the lowest-risk 50% yields 0.141 residual unfaithfulness. RAGScope-E runs in 6.22 ms/example on CPU, versus 145.75 and 223.07 ms/example for the tested DeBERTa-NLI and HHEM settings. A 14,900-example HaluBench stress test exposes the deployment boundary: an in-domain calibrated gate reaches 0.879 AUROC, but leave-source-out calibration averages only 0.466. Target-only calibration recovers to 0.675 AUROC with 100 labels per source and 0.685 with 200. Cheap evidence gates are therefore useful routing components, but learned calibration must be validated and adapted within the target domain.
Related
- Modality Relevance is not Modality Utility: Post-hoc Selective Modality Escalation for Cost-Aware Multimodal RAG
- Query-Aware Source-Risk Triage for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- RAG-CT: Mitigating Privacy Risks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems via Scanning Prompt Distribution
- INTRYGUE: Induction-Aware Entropy Gating for Reliable RAG Uncertainty Estimation
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-01