Rethinking Privileged Information in On-Policy Self-Distillation

arXiv:2608.18271v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) trains a student on its own responses using token-level supervision from the same model conditioned on privileged reference information. We investigate whether performance gains from OPSD show that the student learned the information in the reference or instead reflect recovery of reasoning behavior already present in the base model. We perform OPSD experiments on science and mathematics datasets using Qwen3 models ranging from 1.7B to 8B. Our analysis framework separates the supervision induced by the reference from the supervision provided by the teacher without the reference and measures how each aligns with changes in the student's predictions. The correct reference does not provide a consistent performance benefit across teacher generation modes, model sizes, and training datasets. Students can improve without the correct reference, and a solution from another problem can outperform the correct solution on several mathematical reasoning benchmarks. The student's predictions align more strongly with the base model's thinking behavior than with the supervision induced by the reference, but controls constructed from other problems reproduce much of both alignments. Moreover, stronger alignment attributable to the correct reference does not reliably coincide with a greater performance benefit from the reference. Performance gains and distributional alignment alone therefore cannot determine how privileged reference information contributes to student learning in OPSD.

Related

• Seeing Before Reasoning: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Shortcut-Resilient Multimodal On-Policy Self-Distillation
• Distill What the Student Can See: Fisher-Projected On-Policy Distillation for Vision-Language Models
• AVSD: Adaptive-View Self-Distillation by Balancing Consensus and Teacher-Specific Privileged Signals

Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-08-20