Shall We Play a Game? Language Models for Open-ended Wargames

arXiv:2509.17192v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM-based social simulations can make a generated transcript look like a single behavioral signal, but the model behind that transcript may be doing several different jobs: choosing what an actor says or does, deciding what happens after an action, or both. The difference matters especially in open-ended wargames, where models are prized for handling unusual actions and ambiguous consequences. We report a scoping review of 223 de-duplicated AI-in-wargames and strategic-simulation papers retrieved through May 1, 2026, describing each simulation by its model-control profile: whether the language model has open-ended control over player actions, adjudication, or both. Only 20 of 223 studies (~9%) give language models both roles. Before treating LM outputs as social simulations, researchers need to know how much creative control the model has over actions and consequences. For open-ended simulations, fidelity depends not only on whether agents behave plausibly, but also on whether language models can reliably act as adjudicators or world models.

Related

• InfiMed-ORBIT: Aligning LLMs on Open-Ended Complex Tasks via Rubric-Based Incremental Training
• Resource-constrained Amazons chess decision framework integrating large language models and graph attention
• Reason-Mediated Behavioral Models for Auditing LLM Social Simulators

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-03