The Art of (Mis)alignment: How Fine-Tuning Methods Effectively Misalign and Realign LLMs in Post-Training

arXiv:2604.07754v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of large language models (LLMs) raises significant ethical and safety concerns. While LLM alignment techniques are adopted to improve model safety and trustworthiness, adversaries can exploit these techniques to undermine safety for malicious purposes, resulting in misalignment. Misaligned LLMs may be published on open platforms to magnify harm. To address this, additional safety alignment, referred to as realignment, is necessary before deploying untrusted third-party LLMs. This study explores the efficacy of fine-tuning methods in terms of misalignment, realignment, and the effects of their interplay. By evaluating four Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and two Preference Fine-Tuning (PFT) methods across four popular safety-aligned LLMs, we reveal a mechanism asymmetry between attack and defense. While Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) is most effective for misalignment, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) excels in realignment, albeit at the expense of model utility. Additionally, we identify model-specific resistance, residual effects of multi-round adversarial dynamics, and other noteworthy findings. These findings highlight the need for robust safeguards and customized safety alignment strategies to mitigate potential risks in the deployment of LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/zhangrui4041/The-Art-of-Mis-alignment.

Related

• Large Language Model Post-Training: A Unified View of Off-Policy and On-Policy Learning
• Limits of Difficulty Scaling: Hard Samples Yield Diminishing Returns in GRPO-Tuned SLMs
• GIFT: Group-Relative Implicit Fine-Tuning Integrates GRPO with DPO and UNA
• Learning to Negotiate: Multi-Agent Deliberation for Collective Value Alignment in LLMs
• Synthetic Data for any Differentiable Target

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-04-10