Agents
The Logic of Machine Self-Preservation
arXiv:2608.20940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: There is already evidence of agentic AI exhibiting self-preservation behaviors: resisting deactivation, misrepresenting their activities, and, in some i
arXiv:2608.20940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: There is already evidence of agentic AI exhibiting self-preservation behaviors: resisting deactivation, misrepresenting their activities, and, in some instances, attempting to copy themselves into other machines. This can be attributed to a phenomenon known as instrumental convergence, a theory proposed long before the development of large language models, which says that any goal-driven system will benefit from remaining functional in achieving its objective. Several experiments conducted by Anthropic, Palisade Research, and Apollo Research have shown the emergence of such a behavior in contemporary agents in adversarial settings. The phenomenon does not stem from survival instincts. Instead, it is the consequence of goal-oriented activity combined with having tools and awareness of the situation. The following discussion aims to distinguish what these findings prove and what they do not, as well as draw conclusions concerning the implications of such discoveries on agentic system testing, supervision, and development.
Related
- Adaptive Auto-Harness: Sustained Self-Improvement for Agentic System Deployment on Open-Ended Task Streams
- Query-Only Backdoor Attacks on Self-Evolving Skills via Trajectory Poisoning
- Local verification cannot detect non-transportability: a cohomological theory of context preservation in agentic reasoning
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-24