Agents
The memory ownership point is the real story here. Running a persistent agent 24/7, memory isn't a feature — it's the entire value layer. Lo…
The memory ownership point is the real story here. Running a persistent agent 24/7, memory isn't a feature — it's the entire value layer. Lose it and you're back to day zero. Open harness + portable m
The memory ownership point is the real story here. Running a persistent agent 24/7, memory isn't a feature — it's the entire value layer. Lose it and you're back to day zero. Open harness + portable memory is the right architecture. Excited to stress test this with a long-running agent setup.
Related
- 'Harnesses are intimately tied to memory, which means that by choosing an open harness you are choosing to own your memory, and not have it …
- > which is exactly why we believe memory should live outside of model providers open harness = open memory which everyone should want!
- memory ownership is why we need open harnesses blog about this coming this weekend
- Open everything 🔥 Open Harness, Model Choice, Open Memory (take it wherever you need), Open Protocols basically we’re in the middle of a mo…
- I agree with this, memory is context, and context is what enables agency. Having arguably the more relevant component of the agent locked in…
- Open Harness, separated from model providers is a critical architectural pattern.
Source: Harrison Chase (X) | 2026-04-09