Safety
This is totally wrong. Blaming the user is missing the point that (a) coding agents have been overhyped and (b) can’t reliably obey the rule…
This is totally wrong. Blaming the user is missing the point that (a) coding agents have been overhyped and (b) can’t reliably obey the rules given to them in system prompts and other guardrails. Sorr
This is totally wrong. Blaming the user is missing the point that (a) coding agents have been overhyped and (b) can’t reliably obey the rules given to them in system prompts and other guardrails. Sorry, @lifeof_jer, but this is YOUR failure: 1. Your failure to demonstrate extreme ownership for AI generated code; instead, you abdicated your responsibility and blamed the AI. 2. Your failure to have an adequate and predictive mental model for how LLMs work. 1/2
Related
- @GaryMarcus These coding tools are intellectual chain saws. Powerful in the hands of a caring professional, extremely dangerous to the opera…
- Why have many programmers gone back to handcoding? Because with AI (shocker!) it’s….
- People keep blaming the users for the growing number of vibe-coded reasoners. Doing so is half right. Users arescrewing up - by letting …
- Stop blaming the users. It’s not that simple:
- Amazon’s AI coding boom is creating a mess. Vibe coding their way to chaos.
Source: Gary Marcus (X) | 2026-04-27