Training Alignment Auditors via Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2608.25460v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Alignment auditing of frontier models increasingly relies on LLM auditors to surface undesirable behaviors at scale, but current automated auditors can struggle with coherent investigation and audit realism. In this work, we improve LLM auditors with reinforcement learning. In our best training environment, the policy investigates target models that potentially possess hidden behaviors planted via their system prompt. An LLM judge, which knows whether the target has a hidden behavior, holistically compares the policy's investigation to a reference investigation to determine the reward. With systematic ablations, we find that pairwise rewards yield more robust training compared to pointwise rewards, and that adding targets without planted behaviors helps maintain a low false positive rate. Training improves investigation quality against targets with planted behaviors, the rate of concerning behaviors surfaced in unmodified production models, and audit realism, while false-positive rates stay below 1%. Furthermore, auditing capabilities generalize across scaffolds: performance on AuditBench's adversarially fine-tuned targets substantially improves [Sheshadri et al., 2026].

Related

• Variance-Aware Baselines and Adaptive Learning Rates for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
• What Accuracy and Gradient Cosine Miss: Evaluating Feedback Alignment via Scale Stability, Reference Validity, and Depth Utility
• Epistemic Uncertainty for Test-Time Discovery

Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-08-27