Safety
Transition-Matrix Regularization for Next Dialogue Act Prediction in Counselling Conversations
arXiv:2604.18539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies how empirical dialogue-flow statistics can be incorporated into Next Dialogue Act Prediction (NDAP). A KL regularization term is prop
arXiv:2604.18539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies how empirical dialogue-flow statistics can be incorporated into Next Dialogue Act Prediction (NDAP). A KL regularization term is proposed that aligns predicted act distributions with corpus-derived transition patterns. Evaluated on a 60-class German counselling taxonomy using 5-fold cross-validation, this improves macro-F1 by 9--42% relative depending on encoder and substantially improves dialogue-flow alignment. Cross-dataset validation on HOPE suggests that improvements transfer across languages and counselling domains. In systematic ablations across pretrained encoders and architectures, the findings indicate that transition regularization provides consistent gains and disproportionately benefits weaker baseline models. The results suggest that lightweight discourse-flow priors complement pretrained encoders, especially in fine-grained, data-sparse dialogue tasks.
Related
- The Autocorrelation Blind Spot: Why 42% of Turn-Level Findings in LLM Conversation Analysis May Be Spurious
- EthicMind: A Risk-Aware Framework for Ethical-Emotional Alignment in Multi-Turn Dialogue
- From Myopic Selection to Long-Horizon Awareness: Sequential LLM Routing for Multi-Turn Dialogue
- PEER: Unified Process-Outcome Reinforcement Learning for Structured Empathetic Reasoning
- Aligning Backchannel and Dialogue Context Representations via Contrastive LLM Fine-Tuning
- Beyond Overlap Metrics: Rewarding Reasoning and Preferences for Faithful Multi-Role Dialogue Summarization
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-04-21