What’s your perspective on the common argument that if AI does most of the work, people won’t have income, so who will actually buy products and services?

This Reddit discussion thread explores perspectives on the economic paradox of widespread AI automation, specifically addressing concerns that if AI performs most productive work, unemployment could eliminate consumer purchasing power, creating an unsustainable economic system. The thread likely contains various viewpoints on potential solutions such as universal basic income, economic restructuring, or alternative models for wealth distribution in an AI-driven economy. The conversation reflects broader debates about technological disruption, labor displacement, and the future viability of consumption-based economic models.

Related

• what do you think most people still dont get about using ai well?
• would you let an AI version of you take your Zoom calls?

Source: r/ChatGPT | 2026-04-17