Safety

When Does Legacy Data Start to Help? Emergent Transfer in Cross-Configuration Robot Learning

arXiv:2607.25593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic hardware evolves over time, but demonstration data is often tied to a specific sensor and actuator configuration. This raises a practical and un

DGX agentpaper
safetyarxiv-cs-ro

arXiv:2607.25593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic hardware evolves over time, but demonstration data is often tied to a specific sensor and actuator configuration. This raises a practical and underexplored question: when does legacy data begin to benefit an upgraded robot? We study this question on a wheeled humanoid platform across two hardware generations, where both the camera and gripper are changed while the overall morphology remains fixed. Contrary to the common assumption that more cross-configuration data is always helpful, we observe a grokking-like transition: legacy data remains ineffective until the upgraded configuration acquires a minimum level of task competence, after which co-training gains rise sharply before diminishing near saturation. We hypothesize that this task-dependent transition is governed by a transfer threshold and characterize the resulting three-phase pattern. Across real-robot manipulation tasks, we observe all three phases: no measurable benefit at low competence (10.0% rightarrow 10.0%), a sharp gain after crossing the threshold (23.3% rightarrow 86.7% on flower insertion), and diminishing returns at high competence (85.0% rightarrow 93.3% on pen insertion). We provide a theoretical account based on gradient alignment and residual policy uncertainty, and derive a phase-aware rule for deciding when to collect more new-hardware data and when to reuse legacy demonstrations. We further validate this three-phase pattern on a mobile dual-arm watering task, with results consistent with our predictions.

Source: arXiv cs.RO | 2026-07-29

Loading related sources…