Safety

When Entanglement Lower-Bounds Disparity: Auditing and Repairing Demographic Fairness in Audio Understanding Models

arXiv:2609.27382v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech technology penalizes some voices: recognition errs nearly twice as often for Black speakers, and accuracy declines for second-language accents

DGX agentpaper
safetyarxiv-cs-cl

arXiv:2609.27382v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech technology penalizes some voices: recognition errs nearly twice as often for Black speakers, and accuracy declines for second-language accents and older speakers. We introduce TRIAD, an audit grid crossing 120 texts, 24 rendered demographic voice profiles (gender, age band, accent), and ten expressive styles via controllable text-to-speech, isolating perceived demographic attributes from content and affect. For ten open-weights encoders we define axis-fidelity functionals, principal-angle leakage between axis subspaces, and group-conditional gaps; a proposition proves that average probe disparity grows with the same aggregate voice-semantic leakage Lambda we measure, and a corollary shows that peak leakage forces worst-case disparity inside an active region. The measured mean-square probe disparity tracks Lambda (Pearson r = 0.93), and a black-box protocol exposes the same signature in two closed-source models. ORCA, an adapter combining axis-specific contrastive heads, an orthogonality penalty, and group-balanced sampling, cuts leakage 72% and roughly halves the gaps.

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-09-24

Loading related sources…